Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754742Ab2K3IVp (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2012 03:21:45 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:54454 "EHLO mail-wi0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754611Ab2K3IVo (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2012 03:21:44 -0500 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:21:39 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Simon Glass Cc: Kyungmin Park , linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, jonas.aberg@stericsson.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, Mian Yousaf Kaukab , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Boottime: A tool for automatic measurement of kernel/bootloader boot time Message-ID: <20121130082139.GA26023@gmail.com> References: <1352973847-21605-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1352973847-21605-2-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20121115112543.GC21682@gmail.com> <20121120161638.GD28265@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1626 Lines: 41 On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > >> > > +/* for automatic boot timing testcases */ > >> > > +#define ATAG_BOOTTIME 0x41000403 > >> > Where can I refer this ATAG usage? can you point out the reference URL > >> > or patches? > >> > >> I assumed this would be in Mainline u-boot, but apparently not. > >> On closer inspection of the internal ST-Ericsson u-boot, this > >> functionality appears to be provided by patches which currently > >> exist as delta. So in essence, the bootloader you use will have > >> to be patched in a similar way for you to retrieve information > >> surrounding bootloader boot times. > >> > >> And there was me thinking it was magic. ;) > > > > Okay, so I'm going through the motions of upstreaming this magic > > now. Please see the link below for reference: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=u-boot&m=135342273317337&w=2 > > Given that U-Boot has bootstage, would it make sense to upstream that > to the kernel? Some RFC patches were sent before this went into U-Boot > to sound out the interest. Right. As Simon and I have already discussed, I am pulling the u-boot and kernel boottime components in lieu of bootstage. -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/