Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 07:33:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 07:33:56 -0400 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:23826 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 07:33:56 -0400 Message-ID: <3D81CE43.60409@namesys.com> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:38:43 +0400 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Ivanov CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: XFS? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 560 Lines: 18 Ivan Ivanov wrote: >With ReiserFS this happens sometimes, but much much rarely. May be v4 will >solve this problem at all. > We have a data ordered patch that is waiting for 2.4.21pre1. V4 uses fully atomic transactions for every fs modifying syscall including data, and still goes way faster than v3.... Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/