Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S319622AbSIMMhh>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 08:37:37 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S319623AbSIMMhh>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 08:37:37 -0400
Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:16915 "HELO
	thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S319622AbSIMMhg>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 08:37:36 -0400
Message-ID: <3D81DD34.5070607@namesys.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 16:42:28 +0400
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ivan Ivanov <ivandi@vamo.orbitel.bg>
CC: Nero <neroz@iinet.net.au>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: XFS?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209131250480.8722-100000@magic.vamo.orbitel.bg>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 842
Lines: 26

Ivan Ivanov wrote:

>
>  
>
>
>I am not an expert, just a sysadmin, and I am testing XFS since kernel
>2.4.6 ( I am writing this mail from a test machine with kernel 2.4.18
>and XFS root filesystem ), and I also think that XFS is not ready for
>production ( I lost some unimportant files after a crash yesterday ).
>
>  
>
This merely means that it should be flagged as experimental for a while. 
 There is no way a new filesystem can go into the Linux Kernel and not 
have lots of bugs found by users during the first few months anyway, 
however much we programmers might try to avoid it.

Hans


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/