Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 08:54:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 08:54:35 -0400 Received: from 2-028.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.160.28]:52136 "EHLO 2-028.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 08:54:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 09:59:04 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Andrew Morton cc: lkml , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Rick Lindsley Subject: Re: 2.5.34-mm3 In-Reply-To: <3D819132.C7171BD9@digeo.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1086 Lines: 34 On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Andrew Morton wrote: > Rik, I didn't include the iowait patch because we don't seem to have > a tarball of procps which supports it - the various diffs you have at > http://surriel.com/procps/ appear to be in an intermediate state wrt > cygnus CVS. Umm no, the latest patch I put up yesterday is fully in sync with the cygnus CVS tree ... > The code is in experimental/iowait.patch. Could we have a snapshot > tarball of the support utilities please? ... but I've put up a snapshot, if that makes you happy ;) The snapshot is of the latest procps code from procps CVS, including your patch to top. http://surriel.com/procps/ regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/