Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S319644AbSIMNPn>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 09:15:43 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S319645AbSIMNPn>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 09:15:43 -0400
Received: from smtp.intrex.net ([209.42.192.250]:26387 "EHLO intrex.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S319644AbSIMNPn>;
	Fri, 13 Sep 2002 09:15:43 -0400
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 09:21:28 -0400
From: jlnance@intrex.net
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: XFS?
Message-ID: <20020913092128.B1576@tricia.dyndns.org>
References: <200209121500.g8CF0D30003216@darkstar.example.net> <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020913074543.22464B-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020913074543.22464B-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>; from davidsen@tmr.com on Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 07:53:31AM -0400
X-Declude-Sender: jlnance@intrex.net [216.181.42.97]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 857
Lines: 22

On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 07:53:31AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:

> This is a development kernel, the rules for what goes in should be far
> more open than the stable series. IMHO both JFS (AIX) and XFS (IRIX)
> should be in, because they will not be solid until users actually use
> them, and better that be in a development kernel.

JFS is in isnt it?

> One might note that both JFS and XFS have been around since xiafs was the
> Linux f/s of choice. It's all relative. If you want old and grotty, go
> back to minix f/s.

Ah, you remember xiafs.  Perhaps the first big flamewar on the kernel
mailing list.

Jim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/