Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751320Ab3CANKV (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:10:21 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19247 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750884Ab3CANKT (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:10:19 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:09:11 -0500 From: Jeff Layton To: Stanislav Kinsbursky Cc: bfields@fieldses.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: try nfsdcld client tracker in containers Message-ID: <20130301080911.2a1a28a2@corrin.poochiereds.net> In-Reply-To: <20130301082423.21663.37825.stgit@localhost.localdomain> References: <20130301082423.21663.37825.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3213 Lines: 82 On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:24:23 +0300 Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: > Currently, UMH and Legacy trackers are disabled in containers. > But existent logic can lookup nfs4_recoverydir in a container, and in this > case will try to init Legacy tracker and skip nfsdcld client tracker. > This actually means, that no client tracker will be started in a container at > all, because Legacy tracker init will return -EINVAL for a container. > So, let's change "-EINVAL" on "-ENOTSUPP" for legacy tracker init call in a > container and in case of this error code, try nfsdcld client tracker instead > of returning a error. > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky > --- > fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c > index e0ae1cf..8aa069a 100644 > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c > @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ nfsd4_legacy_tracking_init(struct net *net) > if (net != &init_net) { > WARN(1, KERN_ERR "NFSD: attempt to initialize legacy client " > "tracking in a container!\n"); > - return -EINVAL; > + return -ENOTSUPP; > } > > status = nfs4_legacy_state_init(net); > @@ -1285,14 +1285,17 @@ nfsd4_client_tracking_init(struct net *net) > /* > * See if the recoverydir exists and is a directory. If it is, > * then use the legacy ops. > + * If legacy ops init return -ENOSUPP, then we are in a container and > + * should try nfsdcld client tracking. > */ > nn->client_tracking_ops = &nfsd4_legacy_tracking_ops; > status = kern_path(nfs4_recoverydir(), LOOKUP_FOLLOW, &path); > if (!status) { > - status = S_ISDIR(path.dentry->d_inode->i_mode); > + if (S_ISDIR(path.dentry->d_inode->i_mode)) > + status = nn->client_tracking_ops->init(net); > path_put(&path); > - if (status) > - goto do_init; > + if (status != -ENOTSUPP) > + goto do_exit; > } > > /* Finally, try to use nfsdcld */ > @@ -1302,6 +1305,7 @@ nfsd4_client_tracking_init(struct net *net) > "nfsdcltrack.\n"); > do_init: > status = nn->client_tracking_ops->init(net); > +do_exit: > if (status) { > printk(KERN_WARNING "NFSD: Unable to initialize client " > "recovery tracking! (%d)\n", status); > Seems OK as a stopgap fix. We're removing nfsdcld in 3.10 though so this won't help prospective users of nfsd in a container for long...particularly since our expectation is that no one has actually ever deployed nfsdcld. This is something that really needs to be fixed the right way since a NFS server that doesn't allow clients to reclaim state after a reboot is potentially dangerous... I'm afraid I haven't been following along as closely as I should have been. What's the rationale for disabling the UMH upcall? Is there no way to make it so that new processes it spawns are done within the correct container? -- Jeff Layton -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/