Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:52:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:52:52 -0400 Received: from to-velocet.redhat.com ([216.138.202.10]:57593 "EHLO touchme.toronto.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:52:52 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:57:44 -0400 From: Benjamin LaHaise To: Andrew Morton Cc: Jens Axboe , Suparna Bhattacharya , Shailabh Nagar , Linux Aio , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5 port of aio-20020619 for raw devices Message-ID: <20020913155744.C2969@redhat.com> References: <3D80DB14.2040809@watson.ibm.com> <20020912143540.J18217@redhat.com> <20020913184652.C2758@in.ibm.com> <20020913134404.GG935@suse.de> <3D823DCC.3E303941@digeo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3D823DCC.3E303941@digeo.com>; from akpm@digeo.com on Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 12:34:36PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 793 Lines: 17 On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 12:34:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > It has the disadvantage that we may have some data which is mergeable, > and would in fact nonblockingly fit into a "congested" queue. Don't > know if that makes a lot of difference in practice. That's what I was thinking. Not having a congested queue really breaks aio as your submit point is not supposed to incur significant latency: an io should -EAGAIN if it would cost a large delay to setup. -ben -- "You will be reincarnated as a toad; and you will be much happier." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/