Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:03:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:03:36 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:29454 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:03:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 22:08:23 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: "Grover, Andrew" Cc: "'Marc Giger'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acpi-devel@sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [ACPI] RE: ACPI Status Message-ID: <20020913220823.W10583@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from andrew.grover@intel.com on Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 10:22:21AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 781 Lines: 21 On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 10:22:21AM -0700, Grover, Andrew wrote: > Oops, web content a little stale... hehe. and, more importantly, there's no link from http://acpi.sourceforge.net/devel/ to sf.net/projects/acpi. > As to development status: > > Everything is code complete (more or less) EXCEPT: One thing I'm not clear about is status of support for ACPI 2.0. The FAQ on intel's website claims support for ACPI 1.0b only with 2.0 "in development", but it seems rather out of date. -- Revolutions do not require corporate support. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/