Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757736Ab3CDEGi (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:06:38 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:32807 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756239Ab3CDDnb (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Mar 2013 22:43:31 -0500 Message-Id: <20130304033718.262730828@decadent.org.uk> User-Agent: quilt/0.60-1 Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 03:38:55 +0000 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Xiaowei.Hu" , Srinivas Eeda , Mark Fasheh , Joel Becker , Linus Torvalds Subject: [ 108/153] ocfs2: ac->ac_allow_chain_relink=0 wont disable group relink In-Reply-To: <20130304033707.648729212@decadent.org.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:470:1f08:1539:a11:96ff:fec6:70c4 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4379 Lines: 113 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: "Xiaowei.Hu" commit 309a85b6861fedbb48a22d45e0e079d1be993b3a upstream. ocfs2_block_group_alloc_discontig() disables chain relink by setting ac->ac_allow_chain_relink = 0 because it grabs clusters from multiple cluster groups. It doesn't keep the credits for all chain relink,but ocfs2_claim_suballoc_bits overrides this in this call trace: ocfs2_block_group_claim_bits()->ocfs2_claim_clusters()-> __ocfs2_claim_clusters()->ocfs2_claim_suballoc_bits() ocfs2_claim_suballoc_bits set ac->ac_allow_chain_relink = 1; then call ocfs2_search_chain() one time and disable it again, and then we run out of credits. Fix is to allow relink by default and disable it in ocfs2_block_group_alloc_discontig. Without this patch, End-users will run into a crash due to run out of credits, backtrace like this: RIP: 0010:[] [] jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x164/0x170 [jbd2] RSP: 0018:ffff8801b919b5b8 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88022139ddc0 RCX: ffff880159f652d0 RDX: ffff880178aa3000 RSI: ffff880159f652d0 RDI: ffff880087f09bf8 RBP: ffff8801b919b5e8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000001e00 R11: 00000000000150b0 R12: ffff880159f652d0 R13: ffff8801a0cae908 R14: ffff880087f09bf8 R15: ffff88018d177800 FS: 00007fc9b0b6b6e0(0000) GS:ffff88022fd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b CR2: 000000000040819c CR3: 0000000184017000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Process dd (pid: 9945, threadinfo ffff8801b919a000, task ffff880149a264c0) Call Trace: ocfs2_journal_dirty+0x2f/0x70 [ocfs2] ocfs2_relink_block_group+0x111/0x480 [ocfs2] ocfs2_search_chain+0x455/0x9a0 [ocfs2] ... Signed-off-by: Xiaowei.Hu Reviewed-by: Srinivas Eeda Cc: Mark Fasheh Cc: Joel Becker Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 7 +++---- fs/ocfs2/suballoc.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c @@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ ocfs2_block_group_alloc_discontig(handle * cluster groups will be staying in cache for the duration of * this operation. */ - ac->ac_allow_chain_relink = 0; + ac->ac_disable_chain_relink = 1; /* Claim the first region */ status = ocfs2_block_group_claim_bits(osb, handle, ac, min_bits, @@ -1823,7 +1823,7 @@ static int ocfs2_search_chain(struct ocf * Do this *after* figuring out how many bits we're taking out * of our target group. */ - if (ac->ac_allow_chain_relink && + if (!ac->ac_disable_chain_relink && (prev_group_bh) && (ocfs2_block_group_reasonably_empty(bg, res->sr_bits))) { status = ocfs2_relink_block_group(handle, alloc_inode, @@ -1928,7 +1928,6 @@ static int ocfs2_claim_suballoc_bits(str victim = ocfs2_find_victim_chain(cl); ac->ac_chain = victim; - ac->ac_allow_chain_relink = 1; status = ocfs2_search_chain(ac, handle, bits_wanted, min_bits, res, &bits_left); @@ -1947,7 +1946,7 @@ static int ocfs2_claim_suballoc_bits(str * searching each chain in order. Don't allow chain relinking * because we only calculate enough journal credits for one * relink per alloc. */ - ac->ac_allow_chain_relink = 0; + ac->ac_disable_chain_relink = 1; for (i = 0; i < le16_to_cpu(cl->cl_next_free_rec); i ++) { if (i == victim) continue; --- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.h +++ b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.h @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct ocfs2_alloc_context { /* these are used by the chain search */ u16 ac_chain; - int ac_allow_chain_relink; + int ac_disable_chain_relink; group_search_t *ac_group_search; u64 ac_last_group; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/