Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 12:46:28 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
        linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IMA: How to manage user space signing policy with others
Message-ID: <20130304174628.GC15199@redhat.com>
References: <20130228213534.GF11360@redhat.com>
 <CACLa4pum7kXK+7+8ceVSuQsKDCFebdgGVYRTMKH9GQarqCEgMQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1362102544.9158.35.camel@falcor1>
 <1362140107.9158.101.camel@falcor1>
 <20130301152839.GA3457@redhat.com>
 <20130301184027.GB3457@redhat.com>
 <1362166753.9158.169.camel@falcor1>
 <20130301213329.GC3457@redhat.com>
 <1362346944.18325.1.camel@falcor1>
 <20130304152919.GA15199@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130304152919.GA15199@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 789
Lines: 20

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:29:19AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:

[..]
> This reduces our options but trying to make multiple policies co-exist
> together is just making it complicated. We can take it up again when
> somebody has a strong use case of using secureboot policy along with
> other policies.

Well, I also see the unused hook for module verification. Right now there
is no policy for that but if we ever decide to do module verification
using ima hook, then we will have this question that where does that
rule go in now.

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/