Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 10:51:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 10:51:13 -0400 Received: from [195.39.17.254] ([195.39.17.254]:896 "EHLO Elf.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 10:51:13 -0400 Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 00:46:06 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Alan Cox Cc: Rik van Riel , Jeff Garzik , Paolo Ciarrocchi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: LMbench2.0 results Message-ID: <20020913224559.GA25487@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1031435070.14390.14.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1031435070.14390.14.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1086 Lines: 30 Hi! > > > > Comments? > > > > > > Yeah: "ouch" because I don't see a single category that's faster. > > > > HZ went to 1000, which should help multimedia latencies a lot. > > It shouldn't materially damage performance unless we have other things > extremely wrong. Its easy enough to verify by putting HZ back to 100 and > rebenching 1000 times per second, enter timer interrupt, acknowledge it, exit interrupt. Few i/o accessess, few tlb entries kicked out, some L1 cache consumed? Is 10usec per timer interrupt reasonable on modern system? That's 10 msec per second spend in timer with HZ=1000, thats 1% overall. So it seems to me it is possible for HZ=1000 to have performance impact... Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/