Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 11:06:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 11:06:40 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.18.111]:1549 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 11:06:40 -0400 Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 17:11:32 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Rik van Riel Cc: Hans-Peter Jansen , kernel list Subject: Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34? Message-ID: <20020914151132.GB10510@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <200209141651.00974.hpj@urpla.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 763 Lines: 20 Hi! > > The question is: why is the VM not able to fulfill such a simple need in > > a clean way? > > No. The question is: "why does swsuspend need to stick its fingers > into every other subsystem of the kernel, instead of trying to > remain vaguely modular ?" I'm not trying to stick swsusp fingers anywhere. It was suggested to me to hack VM and I'm trying to avoid that. Pavel -- Casualities in World Trade Center: ~3k dead inside the building, cryptography in U.S.A. and free speech in Czech Republic. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/