Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756552Ab3CEOBb (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:01:31 -0500 Received: from mail-qe0-f50.google.com ([209.85.128.50]:44618 "EHLO mail-qe0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754959Ab3CEOBa (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:01:30 -0500 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: LKML Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , Stanislaw Gruszka , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Oleg Nesterov Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] posix_cpu_timers: Some code consolidation Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 15:01:19 +0100 Message-Id: <1362492082-23019-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.5.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 892 Lines: 28 Hi, Some interesting consolidation comes when we unify the expiry time type. I'm also wondering: can't we implement CPUCLOCK_PROF using CPUCLOCK_SCHED? One is using the tick, the other is using the sched. But they both seem to account the same thing: utime + stime. Thanks. Frederic Weisbecker (3): posix_cpu_timers: Consolidate expiry time type posix_cpu_timers: Consolidate timer list cleanups posix_cpu_timers: Consolidate expired timers check include/linux/posix-timers.h | 16 ++- kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c | 387 +++++++++++++++--------------------------- 2 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 257 deletions(-) -- 1.7.5.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/