Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756647Ab3CEUkY (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Mar 2013 15:40:24 -0500 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:39046 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755276Ab3CEUkW (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Mar 2013 15:40:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 21:40:09 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Daniel Lezcano cc: john.stultz@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, rickard.andersson@stericsson.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4][V2] time : set broadcast irq affinity In-Reply-To: <1362219013-18173-3-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Message-ID: References: <1362219013-18173-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <1362219013-18173-3-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2712 Lines: 73 On Sat, 2 Mar 2013, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > When a cpu goes to a deep idle state where its local timer is shutdown, > it notifies the time frame work to use the broadcast timer instead. > > Unfortunately, the broadcast device could wake up any CPU, including an > idle one which is not concerned by the wake up at all. > > This implies, in the worst case, an idle CPU will wake up to send an IPI > to another idle cpu. > > This patch solves this by setting the irq affinity to the cpu concerned > by the nearest timer event, by this way, the CPU which is wake up is > guarantee to be the one concerned by the next event and we are safe with > unnecessary wakeup for another idle CPU. > > As the irq affinity is not supported by all the archs, a flag is needed > to specify which clocksource can handle it : CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DYNIRQ > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano > --- > include/linux/clockchips.h | 5 +++++ > kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/clockchips.h b/include/linux/clockchips.h > index 6634652..c93e2a6 100644 > --- a/include/linux/clockchips.h > +++ b/include/linux/clockchips.h > @@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ enum clock_event_nofitiers { > #define CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP 0x000008 > #define CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DUMMY 0x000010 > > +/* > + * Clock event device can set its irq affinity dynamically > + */ > +#define CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DYNIRQ 0x000020 > + > /** > * struct clock_event_device - clock event device descriptor > * @event_handler: Assigned by the framework to be called by the low > diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c > index 6197ac0..9ca8ff5 100644 > --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c > +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c > @@ -406,13 +406,37 @@ struct cpumask *tick_get_broadcast_oneshot_mask(void) > return to_cpumask(tick_broadcast_oneshot_mask); > } > > -static int tick_broadcast_set_event(struct clock_event_device *bc, > +/* > + * Set broadcast interrupt affinity > + */ > +static void tick_broadcast_set_affinity(struct clock_event_device *bc, > + const struct cpumask *cpumask) > +{ > + if (!(bc->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DYNIRQ)) > + return; > + > + if (cpumask_equal(bc->cpumask, cpumask)) > + return; > + > + bc->cpumask = cpumask; This breaks with CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y. cpumask_copy() is your friend! Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/