Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 01:03:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 01:03:40 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-043-058.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.43.58]:57504 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 01:03:39 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.34 Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 07:10:00 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: David Brownell , Matthew Dharm , Greg KH , , References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1189 Lines: 30 On Tuesday 10 September 2002 21:03, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On 10 Sep 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > It drops you politely into the kernel debugger, you fix up the values > > and step over it. If you want to debug with zen mind power and printk > > feel free. For the rest of us BUG() is fine on SMP > > Ok, a show of hands.. > > Of the millions (whatever) of Linux machines, how many have a kernel > debugger attached? Count them. Eh, mine is getting one attached to it right now. It's getting more popular, and it would be more popular yet if it weren't considered some dirty little secret, or somehow unmanly. Let's try a different show of hands: How many users would be happier if they knew that kernel developers are using modern techniques to improve the quality of the kernel? Of course, I use the term "modern" here loosely, since kdb and kgdb are really only 80's technology. Without them, we're stuck in the 60's. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/