Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 13:49:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 13:49:55 -0400 Received: from 2-028.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.160.28]:37303 "EHLO 2-028.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 13:49:54 -0400 Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 14:54:27 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: "M. Edward Borasky" cc: Andrew Morton , Axel Siebenwirth , Con Kolivas , lkml , , Subject: RE: 2.5.34-mm4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 810 Lines: 25 On Sun, 15 Sep 2002, M. Edward Borasky wrote: > Borasky's Corollary 1: If you *can* measure it and it *does* exist, the > cheapest solution may still be to buy more memory, more disks or a > faster processor. Current 2.5 is sluggish on systems with a fast CPU and 768 MB of RAM, whereas current -ac runs the same workload smoothly with 128 MB of RAM. Now tell me, what's your point ? Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/