Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 14:01:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 14:01:10 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:25606 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 14:01:09 -0400 Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 11:06:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Daniel Phillips cc: Alan Cox , David Brownell , Matthew Dharm , Greg KH , , Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.34 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1060 Lines: 30 On Sun, 15 Sep 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > Let's try a different show of hands: How many users would be happier if > they knew that kernel developers are using modern techniques to improve > the quality of the kernel? You're all talk and no action. The last time I looked, the people who really _do_ improve the quality of the kernel don't tend to care too much about debuggers, or are at least capable to add a patch on their own. In fact, of the people who opened their mouth about the BUG() issue, how many actually ended up personally _debugging_ the BUG() that we were talking about? I did. Matt probably did. But I didn't see you fixing it with your debugger. So next time you bring up the kernel debugger issue, show some code and real improvement first. Until then, don't spout off. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/