Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 16:18:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 16:18:40 -0400 Received: from mail.cyberus.ca ([216.191.240.111]:8428 "EHLO cyberus.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 16:18:40 -0400 Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 16:16:13 -0400 (EDT) From: jamal To: "David S. Miller" cc: , , , , Subject: Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 In-Reply-To: <20020913.150439.27187393.davem@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1272 Lines: 39 10 gige becomes more of an interesting beast. Not sure if we would see servers with 10gige real soon now. Your proposal does make sense although compute power would still be a player. I think the key would be parallelization; Now if it wasnt for the stupid way TCP options were designed you could easily do remote DMA instead. Would be relatively easy to add NIC support for that. Maybe SCTP would save us ;-> however, if history could be used to predict the future, i think TCP will continue to be "hacked" and fit the throughput requirements so no chance for SCTP to be a big player i am afraid . cheers, jamal On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, David S. Miller wrote: > From: todd-lkml@osogrande.com > Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:59:15 -0600 (MDT) > > not sure i understand what you're proposing > > Cards in the future at 10gbit and faster are going to provide > facilities by which: > > 1) You register a IPV4 src_addr/dst_addr TCP src_port/dst_port cookie > with the hardware when TCP connections are openned. > [..] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/