Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756074Ab3CGN5r (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Mar 2013 08:57:47 -0500 Received: from arkanian.console-pimps.org ([212.110.184.194]:36245 "EHLO arkanian.console-pimps.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755152Ab3CGN5p (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Mar 2013 08:57:45 -0500 Message-ID: <1362664663.15011.194.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] efivarfs: fix abnormal GUID in variable name by using strcpy to replace null with dash From: Matt Fleming To: joeyli Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Schroeder , Josh Boyer , Peter Jones , Matthew Garrett , Frederic Crozat Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 13:57:43 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1362656348.15011.166.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1362108018-13117-1-git-send-email-jlee@suse.com> <1362151068.2842.440.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> <1362155493.2842.446.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> <1362181299.23932.168.camel@linux-s257.site> <1362555258.23932.573.camel@linux-s257.site> <1362568750.15011.24.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> <1362652440.28562.26.camel@linux-s257.site> <1362656348.15011.166.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4 (3.4.4-2.fc17) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1260 Lines: 29 On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 11:39 +0000, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 18:34 +0800, joeyli wrote: > > The VariableNameSize is not reliable when EFI_SUCCESS is returned > > because UEFI 2.3.1 spec only mention VariableNameSize should updated > > when EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL is returned. And, the 1024 bytes of buffer is > > from old UEFI spec. There doesn't have any size condition of variable > > data or variable name in 2.3.1 spec. > > The spec may only mention what happens in the EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL case, > but for EFI_SUCCESS, any behaviour other than leaving VariableNameSize > alone or updating it with the required size of the buffer is just > completely insane. > > > I modified the patch to grab VariableNameSize when EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL, > > the behavior like what we do in efivarfs_file_read(). > > Thanks, this does seem like the most robust solution. Also, you're probably going to need to update efivar_update_sysfs_entries() too. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/