Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 17:51:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 17:51:38 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:30674 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 17:51:37 -0400 Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 17:56:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Ingo Molnar X-X-Sender: mingo@devserv.devel.redhat.com To: Matthew Wilcox cc: Linus Torvalds , Subject: Re: problem with "Use CLONE_KERNEL for the common kernel thread flags"? In-Reply-To: <20020915225419.F10583@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 744 Lines: 21 On Sun, 15 Sep 2002, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > -#define CLONE_SIGNAL (CLONE_SIGHAND | CLONE_THREAD) > +#define CLONE_KERNEL (CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES | CLONE_SIGHAND) > - kernel_thread(init, NULL, CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES | CLONE_SIGNAL); > + kernel_thread(init, NULL, CLONE_KERNEL); > > init used to be spawned with CLONE_THREAD and no longer is. Was this > intentional? [...] i think Linus combined a cleanup with the fix i sent earlier today, so this does look intentional. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/