Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933473Ab3CGWRn (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Mar 2013 17:17:43 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:60677 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758979Ab3CGWRm (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Mar 2013 17:17:42 -0500 Message-ID: <513911F9.8050308@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:17:29 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130219 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Fleming CC: Seth Forshee , Matthew Garrett , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] efivars: Allow disabling use as a pstore backend References: <1362678017-2862-1-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com> <5138FAD9.7050504@zytor.com> <20130307205915.GF24233@thinkpad-t410> <1362694529.15011.211.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1362694529.15011.211.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1405 Lines: 37 On 03/07/2013 02:15 PM, Matt Fleming wrote: >>> >>> What about a command line option? >> >> That could be done. I'm assuming you want this instead of a config >> option, defaulted to on? >> >> How would you feel about a config option for the default value of the >> command line option? I intend to default this to off in Ubuntu for a >> while as a colleague's machine was recently bricked on two different >> occasions after the kernel oopsed. The config option would simplify >> things a bit for us, though we could always carry a patch changing the >> default value. > > Not sure why a command line option would be a more natural solution to > this problem? The original patch looked fine to me. All other pstore > backends are guarded by Kconfig options. > > Though I could see an argument for a kernel parameter to turn off the > EFI pstore backend code, even if it's compiled into the kernel. But that > would be better as an additional patch. > That way it can be enabled if needed, without the user having to build their own kernel. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/