Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261205AbSIPIcq>; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 04:32:46 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261228AbSIPIcq>; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 04:32:46 -0400
Received: from server0027.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.36]:45981 "EHLO
	server0027.freedom2surf.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S261205AbSIPIcq>; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 04:32:46 -0400
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 09:50:04 +0100
From: Ian Molton <spyro@f2s.com>
To: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.34
Message-Id: <20020916095004.3ae2b901.spyro@f2s.com>
In-Reply-To: <200209160236.g8G2a6Qn022070@pimout3-ext.prodigy.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209101156510.7106-100000@home.transmeta.com>
	<E17qRfU-0001qz-00@starship>
	<20020915020739.A22101@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
	<200209160236.g8G2a6Qn022070@pimout3-ext.prodigy.net>
Organization: The Dragon Roost
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.1cvs22 (GTK+ 1.2.10; )
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 679
Lines: 16

On Sun, 15 Sep 2002 17:35:59 -0400
Rob Landley <landley@trommello.org> wrote:

> I think we agree.  So why recommend against debuggers if they save
> time and effort while producing patches of equal quality?

I think the point here is that debuggers are not for everyone. They are
a tool, in much the same way as an adjustable wrench is. I prefer a set
of spanners.

Is there anything wrong with NOT wanting to use a debugger? really?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/