Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752437Ab3CJMp2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Mar 2013 08:45:28 -0400 Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.160]:62994 "EHLO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751074Ab3CJMp0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Mar 2013 08:45:26 -0400 X-RZG-AUTH: :P2MHfkW8eP4Mre39l357AZT/I7AY/7nT2yrT1q0ngWNsKR9Dbc7nsXB+5kzIuKuS8A== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Message-ID: <513C8062.6030001@hartkopp.net> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:45:22 +0100 From: Oliver Hartkopp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Valentin Ilie CC: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: can: af_can.c: Fix checkpatch warnings References: <1362918526-26730-1-git-send-email-valentin.ilie@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1362918526-26730-1-git-send-email-valentin.ilie@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1720 Lines: 65 Hallo Valentin, thanks for the idea for the cleanup. But if you replace the the printk() statements it's worth to check if code fits into a single line now, e.g. On 10.03.2013 13:28, Valentin Ilie wrote: r = NULL; > @@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ int can_proto_register(const struct can_proto *cp) > int err = 0; > > if (proto < 0 || proto >= CAN_NPROTO) { > - printk(KERN_ERR "can: protocol number %d out of range\n", > + pr_err("can: protocol number %d out of range\n", > proto); here " ,proto);" can obviously be move into the previous line while preserving the 80 chars per line rule. > return -EINVAL; > } > @@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ int can_proto_register(const struct can_proto *cp) > mutex_lock(&proto_tab_lock); > > if (proto_tab[proto]) { > - printk(KERN_ERR "can: protocol %d already registered\n", > + pr_err("can: protocol %d already registered\n", > proto); here too > err = -EBUSY; > } else > @@ -817,8 +817,7 @@ static int can_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long msg, > /* create new dev_rcv_lists for this device */ > d = kzalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!d) { > - printk(KERN_ERR > - "can: allocation of receive list failed\n"); > + pr_err("can: allocation of receive list failed\n"); > return NOTIFY_DONE; > } As i've seen in former patches from Joe Perches OOM messages are obsolete. You could write if(!d) return NOTIFY_DONE; here instead. Thanks, Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/