Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:26:01 +0100 (CET)
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
To: "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: A proposal to check the device in generic way
In-Reply-To: <1363001537.18714.3.camel@smile>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1303111302340.21241@axis700.grange>
References: <1363001537.18714.3.camel@smile>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2144
Lines: 66

Hi Andriy

(adding Russell to CC)

On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Shevchenko, Andriy wrote:

> Hello.
> 
> Currently in linux-next we have the following things:
> 
> $ git grep -n 'chan->device->dev->driver' drivers/dma/
> 
> drivers/dma/amba-pl08x.c:1594:  if (chan->device->dev->driver !=
> &pl08x_amba_driver.drv)
> drivers/dma/dmaengine.c:190:    return chan->device->dev->driver->owner;
> drivers/dma/edma.c:609: if (chan->device->dev->driver ==
> &edma_driver.driver) {
> drivers/dma/omap-dma.c:654:     if (chan->device->dev->driver ==
> &omap_dma_driver.driver) {
> drivers/dma/pl330.c:2374:       if (chan->device->dev->driver !=
> &pl330_driver.drv)
> drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c:1080:  if (chan->device->dev->driver ==
> &sa11x0_dma_driver.driver) 
> 
> I think it's a non-generic way to check which driver provides a channel
> into filter function. First of all, I don't get why that comparison goes
> as deep as driver structure. Isn't clearer to check chan->device->dev
> against the struct dev passed in the custom parameter structure? Like:
> 
> struct filter_params {
>  struct dev *dev;
>  void *param;
> };

I don't think you always know which DMA device you want to use with this 
DMA client - sometimes there are several DMA engine devices, that can be 
used with your DMA client, or even if it's only one, you don't necessarily 
have a pointer to it in your DMA client.

Thanks
Guennadi

> bool filter_fn(struct dma_chan *chan, void *fparams)
> {
>   struct filter_params *p = fparams;
>   if (chan->device->dev != p->dev)
>    return false;
>  ...
> }
> 
> In case my idea has a right to live, what about to move such check inside
> DMA engine code?
> 
> Opinions, comments?
> 
> Earlier I tried to discuss this with Arnd here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg220716.html

---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/