Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:12:15 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] EDAC fixes for 3.8
Message-ID: <20130311111215.3f12e9ee@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130311134814.GB5000@pd.tnic>
References: <20121211140108.GC4303@liondog.tnic>
	<20130307095703.03d040ee@redhat.com>
	<20130307130635.GD5239@pd.tnic>
	<20130307110213.7a5a9978@redhat.com>
	<20130309154635.GA18316@pd.tnic>
	<20130311090746.199a4c06@redhat.com>
	<20130311092848.652c0d46@redhat.com>
	<20130311134814.GB5000@pd.tnic>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1137
Lines: 28

Em Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:48:14 +0100
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> escreveu:

> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:28:48AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > With this patch, mci->csbased field got unused. So, it makes sense to
> > also remove it. The enclosed patch does that.
> 
> AFAIR, this whole fixing was done for K8 as reported by Josh Hunt from
> Akamai: http://marc.info/?l=linux-edac&m=134740440610678 (the whole
> thread contains the discussion).
> 
> So, before we go and change anything in amd64_edac, we need to test
> those on a K8 box. Now, I need ot find one but it would be good if you
> could find one too at RH and test the patches on it before we continue
> with this.

Ok, I'll test it on a K8 box at RH. 

The bug seems to be on K8 rev F, right? Is there a different PCI ID on those
machines? That would help me to quickly find such machine on at RH labs.

Regards,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/