Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 14:30:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 14:30:00 -0400 Received: from p50887801.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.136.120.1]:48280 "EHLO hawkeye.luckynet.adm") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 14:29:59 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:35:06 -0600 (MDT) From: Thunder from the hill X-X-Sender: thunder@hawkeye.luckynet.adm To: Larry McVoy cc: Rob Landley , Pete Zaitcev , Daniel Phillips , , Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.34 In-Reply-To: <20020915200002.B23345@work.bitmover.com> Message-ID: X-Location: Dorndorf/Steudnitz; Germany MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 962 Lines: 26 Hi, On Sun, 15 Sep 2002, Larry McVoy wrote: > It's true that one can write supportable perl but noone but a naive person > would base a multiple platform, multi-year lifespan product on perl. Perl is pretty useful for code generation and/or parsing, e.g. in order to find mistakes you did or to build the thing you've created. It can also be used to convert code. Thus I wouldn't say it's useless in an multiple-platform multi-year environment. > All I'm saying is that thinking is greater than debuggers. Much > greater. That's true, but no reason to eat people for breakfast coz they do use debuggers to get beyond where code does what wrong. Thunder -- !assert(typeof((fool)->next) == typeof(fool)); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/