Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 15:56:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 15:56:02 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:15846 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 15:56:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:52:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020916.125211.82482173.davem@redhat.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, todd-lkml@osogrande.com Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, tcw@tempest.prismnet.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com, pfeather@cs.unm.edu Subject: Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: References: <20020913.150439.27187393.davem@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 948 Lines: 30 From: todd-lkml@osogrande.com Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 08:16:47 -0600 (MDT) are there any standards in progress to support this. Your question makes no sense, it is a hardware optimization of an existing standard. The chip merely is told what flows exist and it concatenates TCP data from consequetive packets for that flow if they arrive in sequence. who is working on this architecture for receives? Once cards with the feature exist, probably Alexey and myself will work on it. Basically, who ever isn't busy with something else once the technology appears. is there a beginning implementation yet of zerocopy receives No. Franks a lot, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/