Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 17:33:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 17:33:25 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:19431 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 17:33:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 14:29:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020916.142931.126209536.davem@redhat.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, todd-lkml@osogrande.com Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, tcw@tempest.prismnet.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com, pfeather@cs.unm.edu Subject: Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: References: <20020916.125211.82482173.davem@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 818 Lines: 19 From: todd-lkml@osogrande.com Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 15:32:56 -0600 (MDT) new system calls into the networking code The system calls would go into the VFS, sys_receivefile is not networking specific in any way shape or form. And to answer your question, if I had the time I'd work on it yes. Right now the answer to "well do you have the time" is no, I am working on something much more important wrt. Linux networking. I've hinted at what this is in previous postings, and if people can't figure out what it is I'm not going to mention this explicitly :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/