Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933065Ab3CLQHH (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:07:07 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:42026 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933006Ab3CLQHD (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:07:03 -0400 Message-ID: <513F5298.6000500@pengutronix.de> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:06:48 +0100 From: Marc Kleine-Budde Organization: Pengutronix e.K. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roger Quadros CC: balbi@ti.com, tony@atomide.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, "Ujfalusi, Peter" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] usb: phy: nop: Add some parameters to platform data References: <1363087466-32444-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <1363087466-32444-2-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <513F177D.40500@pengutronix.de> <513F37DD.9030301@ti.com> <513F38DF.5040404@pengutronix.de> <513F3B7E.8000002@ti.com> <513F3EF0.3030609@pengutronix.de> <513F47B4.2060004@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <513F47B4.2060004@ti.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2CGKASVCESFBPGLHQVWVG" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:4:5054:ff:fe8d:eefb X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mkl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3867 Lines: 108 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2CGKASVCESFBPGLHQVWVG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/12/2013 04:20 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: > On 03/12/2013 04:42 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> On 03/12/2013 03:28 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: >>> On 03/12/2013 04:17 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >>>> On 03/12/2013 03:12 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: >>>>> On 03/12/2013 01:54 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >>>>>> On 03/12/2013 12:24 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: >>>>>>> Add clk_rate parameter to platform data. If supplied, the >>>>>>> NOP phy driver will program the clock to that rate during probe. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also add 2 flags, needs_vcc and needs_reset. >>>>>>> If the flag is set and the regulator couldn't be found >>>>>>> then the driver will bail out with -EPROBE_DEFER. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there a platform which fills out pdata.needs_vcc and >>>>>> pdata.needs_reset? IMHO it makes no sense to add features for the = non DT >>>>>> case, if there isn't any user for it. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> There can be a user in the non DT case as well. Consider the follow= ing example: >>>> >>>> I'm just saying, let the implementation up to a real user for the no= n DT >>>> case. Beagleboard is ARM and there's no point of implementing non DT= >>>> fall backs for ARM, IMHO. >>>> >>> >>> Why do you say so? >>> >>> It doesn't depend on the CPU architecture. It depends on how the boar= d designer >>> wired the board. A non ARM platform could also face the same problem = as beagle. >> >> Using -EPROBE_DEFER ist the way to solve the problem. >=20 > did you mean isn't? If you did then what is the other option? You're using -EPROBE_DEFER, that's all perfectly fine. >>> It is not a non DT fallback. I believe many are still using non DT bo= ot and it >>> needs to work at least till we move all functionality to purely DT. >> >> From my point of view, it makes no sense today to implement new featur= es >> which have a fallback for the non-DT case, if there isn't a real user = of >> this feature. So IMHO don't add needs_vcc and needs_reset flags to the= >> pdata, just take the information from the DT. As soon as there is a >> non-DT user of this feature she/he can implement it or even better >> switch to DT. >=20 > Adding Peter to the loop. I faintly remember him mentioning this issue = before > for beagle. We really need the deferred probe mechanism or we need to r= esort > to device registering order. > The first user for needs_vcc flag will be the beagleboard file. I just = didn't > implement it in this patch [1]. Okay, I wrongly assumed that there wouldn't be added any new features to the old non-DT board files. > On second thoughts, since [1] does work on beagleboard without requirin= g the > needs_vcc flag, I think we can just live without it. Marc --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | ------enig2CGKASVCESFBPGLHQVWVG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlE/UpsACgkQjTAFq1RaXHPoPgCfYxKeyNZejjADDKEVIFvuoEZL eSMAnAs+6wcktL34QPVqPjcoPvxKGca6 =bv+y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2CGKASVCESFBPGLHQVWVG-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/