Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:26:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:26:51 -0400 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237]:1778 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:26:51 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 13/07/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: References: <20020916120022.22FFC2C12A@lists.samba.org> To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Rusty Russell , Roman Zippel , Jamie Lokier , Alexander Viro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Understanding the Principles of Argumentation #3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 23:31:07 +0100 Message-ID: <11627.1032215467@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 800 Lines: 22 phillips@arcor.de said: > This is the third in my "Understanding the Principles of > Argumentation" series. Rusty has obligingly provided us with a fine > example of an "ad hominem attack": It is my understanding that the ad hominem fallacy takes the form "you are a patronising little shit, therefore what you say cannot be true". Rusty's comment seemed to be only that you were a patronising little shit, and not that this proved you to be incorrect -- hence it doesn't appear to be a particularly fine example of 'ad hominem' at all. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/