Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753221Ab3CMFYs (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Mar 2013 01:24:48 -0400 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:36398 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751257Ab3CMFYr (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Mar 2013 01:24:47 -0400 Message-ID: <51400D9D.9060305@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:24:45 -0600 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Huang CC: Russell King - ARM Linux , "mturquette@linaro.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "patches@linaro.org" Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] clk: Add notifier support in clk_prepare_enable/clk_disable_unprepare References: <1363091861-21534-1-git-send-email-bilhuang@nvidia.com> <20130312134032.GU4977@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1363139273.21694.11.camel@bilhuang-vm1> <514003B6.8020904@wwwdotorg.org> <1363151317.3311.9.camel@bilhuang-vm1> In-Reply-To: <1363151317.3311.9.camel@bilhuang-vm1> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2917 Lines: 58 On 03/12/2013 11:08 PM, Bill Huang wrote: > On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 12:42 +0800, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 03/12/2013 07:47 PM, Bill Huang wrote: >>> On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 21:40 +0800, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 05:37:41AM -0700, Bill Huang wrote: >>>>> Add the below four notifier events so drivers which are interested in >>>>> knowing the clock status can act accordingly. This is extremely useful >>>>> in some of the DVFS (Dynamic Voltage Frequency Scaling) design. >>>>> >>>>> PRE_CLK_ENABLE >>>>> POST_CLK_ENABLE >>>>> PRE_CLK_DISABLE >>>>> POST_CLK_DISABLE >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Bill Huang >>>> >>>> NAK. *Sigh* NO, this is the wrong level to be doing stuff like this. >>>> >>>> The *ONLY* thing that clk_prepare_enable() and clk_prepare_disable() should >>>> *EVER* be doing is calling clk_prepare(), clk_enable(), clk_disable() and >>>> clk_unprepare(). Those two functions are *merely* helpers for drivers >>>> who don't wish to make the individual calls. >>>> >>>> Drivers are still completely free to call the individual functions, at >>>> which point your proposal breaks horribly - and they _do_ call the >>>> individual functions. >>> >>> I'm proposing to give device driver a choice when it knows that some >>> driver might be interested in knowing its clock's enabled/disabled state >>> change at runtime, this is very important for centralized DVFS core >>> driver. It is not meant to be covering all cases especially for drivers >>> which is not part of the DVFS, so we don't care if it is calling >>> clk_enable/disable directly or not. >> >> I believe the point Russell is making is not that the idea behind this >> patch is wrong, but simply that the function where you put the hooks is >> wrong. The hooks should at least be in clk_enable/clk_disable and not >> clk_prepare_enable/clk_disable_unprepare, since any driver is free to >> call clk_prepare separately from clk_enable. The hooks should be >> implemented in the lowest-level common function that all >> driver-accessible paths call through. > > Thanks, I know the point, but unfortunately there is no good choice for > hooking this since those low level functions clk_enable/clk_disable will > be called in interrupt context so it is not possible to send notify. We > might need to come out a better approach if we can think of any. > Currently I still think this is acceptable (Having all the drivers which > are using our interested clocks call these function to enable/disable > clock in their runtime_pm calls) though it's not perfect. No, that definitely won't work. Not all drivers use those APIs, nor should they. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/