Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933007Ab3CMOWo (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:22:44 -0400 Received: from mailout2.samsung.com ([203.254.224.25]:26483 "EHLO mailout2.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751901Ab3CMOWn (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:22:43 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfee68e-b7f946d000001e37-ec-51408bb138c4 From: Seungwon Jeon To: "'Markos Chandras'" , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "'Jaehoon Chung'" , "'Chris Ball'" References: <1363085593-22214-1-git-send-email-markos.chandras@imgtec.com> In-reply-to: <1363085593-22214-1-git-send-email-markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] dw_mmc: Don't loop when handling an interrupt Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 23:22:40 +0900 Message-id: <002501ce1ff6$38e3c470$aaab4d50$%jun@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ks_c_5601-1987 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-index: Ac4fEBFFQXQczuDeSaKJ422J86jj4gA5D5PA Content-language: ko X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrIIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t8zI92N3Q6BBp/2mVhsf72RzeLGrzZW i8u75rBZHPnfz2jx+fZ2VgdWj56dZxg9Dl1Zy+jRt2UVo8fnTXIBLFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglc GY9OLmUtuMtScemWTAPjK+YuRk4OCQETiSVtMLaYxIV769lAbCGBZYwS944nwNQ0bz3A3sXI BRSfzijxoOUrC4Tzh1HiR+9fVpAqNgEtib9v3oBNEhHwlTj39zs7iM0skC1xvLeJGWKql8T7 pzvAbE4Bb4m25ilg24QF3CTuHO9jBLFZBFQlvu68AjaTV8BW4m/7BEYIW1Dix+R7LBAzDSTe z+pjhbDlJTaveQs0kwPoUnWJR391IU4wkpjafIYNokREYt+Ld4wgN0sIXGKXeLqklQlil4DE t8mHWCB6ZSU2HYAGhKTEwRU3WCYwSsxCsnkWks2zkGyehWTFAkaWVYyiqQXJBcVJ6UVGesWJ ucWleel6yfm5mxgh0dm3g/HmAetDjMlA6ycyS4km5wOjO68k3tDYzMjC1MTU2Mjc0ow0YSVx XrUW60AhgfTEktTs1NSC1KL4otKc1OJDjEwcnFINjJ7rrYr/J2x0nvSGYeq1QiGFM6/0V196 ovmobPq8c1FauU3RFw045rR33zh6JoWpIkDp37qprOsa3zOtODfntK4jN/fkPLVDRy8dif/C kj99Q8aGdtPKxH+P1N0m5/3dOjtnT9vLGC0VmS0WCrec1LsFf25e9T1PdSMvT2mHgZJ7rdmT NUf5PJRYijMSDbWYi4oTAfkaFW7kAgAA X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrPKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t9jQd2N3Q6BBr/OGFhsf72RzeLGrzZW i8u75rBZHPnfz2jx+fZ2VgdWj56dZxg9Dl1Zy+jRt2UVo8fnTXIBLFENjDYZqYkpqUUKqXnJ +SmZeem2St7B8c7xpmYGhrqGlhbmSgp5ibmptkouPgG6bpk5QIuVFMoSc0qBQgGJxcVK+naY JoSGuOlawDRG6PqGBMH1GBmggYR1jBmPTi5lLbjLUnHplkwD4yvmLkZODgkBE4nmrQfYIWwx iQv31rN1MXJxCAlMZ5R40PKVBcL5wyjxo/cvK0gVm4CWxN83b8C6RQR8Jc79/Q7WzSyQLXG8 twksLiTgJfH+6Q4wm1PAW6KteQobiC0s4CZx53gfI4jNIqAq8XXnFbCZvAK2En/bJzBC2IIS PybfY4GYaSDxflYfK4QtL7F5zVugmRxAl6pLPPqrC3GCkcTU5jNsECUiEvtevGOcwCg0C8mk WUgmzUIyaRaSlgWMLKsYRVMLkguKk9JzDfWKE3OLS/PS9ZLzczcxgqP/mdQOxpUNFocYBTgY lXh4Bb7aBwqxJpYVV+YeYpTgYFYS4V2e6xAoxJuSWFmVWpQfX1Sak1p8iDEZ6NGJzFKiyfnA xJRXEm9obGJmZGlkZmFkYm5OmrCSOO+BVutAIYH0xJLU7NTUgtQimC1MHJxSDYyb+AVeml1U 9rM9unqS1eT4mNUaszRZN0w/8Udh0zubOa5CNw/dd2jR9Y2xXjHtwlTTsjQZJkmB8le39ENU Gh9+3pHV2/zowvWvK2tknR8tv6vw5WJ9PrtPbPbNHI6lqo/XWdyLmRDkJVZyw5brm5Vy64Pr 2eltxyY/k8yauNh8/5kGN9//TreUWIozEg21mIuKEwGxVEXnQgMAAA== DLP-Filter: Pass X-MTR: 20000000000000000@CPGS X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 833 Lines: 22 On Tuesday, March 12, 2013, Markos Chandras wrote: > There is no reason to loop when handling an interrupt. The "if" clauses > will handle all of them sequentially. This also eliminates the extra loop > we used to take with no pending interrupts and we ended up breaking out > of the while loop. > > Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras > Cc: Seungwon Jeon Acked-by: Seungwon Jeon You can add my ack to other patches. However, could you change the subject prefix to 'mmc: dw_mmc' and resend? Thanks, Seungwon Jeon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/