Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933513Ab3CMO0z (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:26:55 -0400 Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:59633 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756411Ab3CMO0x (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:26:53 -0400 From: Chris Ball To: Seungwon Jeon Cc: "'Markos Chandras'" , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "'Jaehoon Chung'" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dw_mmc: Don't loop when handling an interrupt References: <1363085593-22214-1-git-send-email-markos.chandras@imgtec.com> <002501ce1ff6$38e3c470$aaab4d50$%jun@samsung.com> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:26:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <002501ce1ff6$38e3c470$aaab4d50$%jun@samsung.com> (Seungwon Jeon's message of "Wed, 13 Mar 2013 23:22:40 +0900") Message-ID: <87a9q7fk9l.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1030 Lines: 28 Hi, On Wed, Mar 13 2013, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > On Tuesday, March 12, 2013, Markos Chandras wrote: >> There is no reason to loop when handling an interrupt. The "if" clauses >> will handle all of them sequentially. This also eliminates the extra loop >> we used to take with no pending interrupts and we ended up breaking out >> of the while loop. >> >> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras >> Cc: Seungwon Jeon > > Acked-by: Seungwon Jeon > > You can add my ack to other patches. > However, could you change the subject prefix to 'mmc: dw_mmc' and resend? It's okay, I'll take care of that when applying this time. Thanks! - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/