Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:03:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:03:30 -0400 Received: from to-velocet.redhat.com ([216.138.202.10]:33778 "EHLO touchme.toronto.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:03:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:08:28 -0400 From: Benjamin LaHaise To: Roberto Nibali Cc: Kirk Reiser , Skip Ford , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.35 undefined reference to `wait_task_inactive' Message-ID: <20020917110828.D23555@redhat.com> References: <200209160644.g8G6iEvo006691@pool-141-150-241-241.delv.east.verizon.net> <3D87422B.3080300@drugphish.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3D87422B.3080300@drugphish.ch>; from ratz@drugphish.ch on Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 04:54:35PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 736 Lines: 18 On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 04:54:35PM +0200, Roberto Nibali wrote: > BTW, ACPI needs a few tunings too to be able to compile the stuff as > modules, but I'm sure that also here it's not the right thing to do, I > simply did a quick hack to have a running and bootable 2.5.35 kernel: ... > +#ifdef MODULE > ACPI_MODULE_NAME ("hwgpe") > +#endif Btw, why not put the #ifdef in the header file that defines ACPI_MODULE_NAME(x) instead of littering more #ifdefs around code? -ben - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/