Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:14:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:14:59 -0400 Received: from adsl-196-233.cybernet.ch ([212.90.196.233]:28926 "HELO mailphish.drugphish.ch") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:14:58 -0400 Message-ID: <3D87488E.8070301@drugphish.ch> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 17:21:50 +0200 From: Roberto Nibali User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin LaHaise Cc: Kirk Reiser , Skip Ford , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.35 undefined reference to `wait_task_inactive' References: <200209160644.g8G6iEvo006691@pool-141-150-241-241.delv.east.verizon.net> <3D87422B.3080300@drugphish.ch> <20020917110828.D23555@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 788 Lines: 22 >>+#ifdef MODULE >> ACPI_MODULE_NAME ("hwgpe") >>+#endif > > Btw, why not put the #ifdef in the header file that defines > ACPI_MODULE_NAME(x) instead of littering more #ifdefs around code? Right, stupid me. With that I even catch those modules I didn't explicitly set to 'm' in the ACPI subtree. But I guess this is up to the Intel guys anyway. If they don't patch it by 2.5.36 I'll submit a clean patch myself. Regards, Roberto Nibali, ratz -- echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq'|dc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/