Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:33:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:33:03 -0400 Received: from to-velocet.redhat.com ([216.138.202.10]:6137 "EHLO touchme.toronto.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:33:02 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:38:02 -0400 From: Benjamin LaHaise To: "Chen, Kenneth W" Cc: linux-aio@kvack.org, Linux Kernel Subject: Re: libaio 0.3.92 test release Message-ID: <20020917153802.K23555@redhat.com> References: <794826DE8867D411BAB8009027AE9EB913D03F15@fmsmsx38.fm.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <794826DE8867D411BAB8009027AE9EB913D03F15@fmsmsx38.fm.intel.com>; from kenneth.w.chen@intel.com on Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 12:31:00PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 905 Lines: 22 On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 12:31:00PM -0700, Chen, Kenneth W wrote: > several questions regarding to aio-20020916 release: > > In fs/aio.c, it doesn't appear that the API as well as the implementation > are sync'ed up with what's in 2.5.x. And this leads to the following > discrepancy compare to what's in 2.5: Yeah, I missed a couple and have to add test cases for them to the test suite (those test programs were separate from libaio, and will soon no longer be). That'll be fixed in today's test release. > Is there another release (hopefully soon) to sync up fs/aio.c with 2.5? or > is it going to be never? Of course! Why wouldn't there be? -ben - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/