Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 16:34:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 16:34:05 -0400 Received: from air-2.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:4622 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 16:34:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:35:53 -0700 (PDT) From: "Randy.Dunlap" X-X-Sender: To: Duc Vianney cc: , Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Hyperthreading performance on 2.4.19 and 2.5.32 In-Reply-To: <3D878A90.F5E4B8B0@us.ibm.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 898 Lines: 25 On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Duc Vianney wrote: | The following are data comparing the effects of hyperthreading (HT)on | stock kernel 2.4.19 and 2.5.32. | Hardware under test. The hardware is a Xeon 1-CPU MP, 1.6 gigahertz, | and 2.5 GB RAM. | Kernel under test. When testing under 2.4.19, the kernel was built | as an SMP kernel, and was run on the hardware with HT enabled through | the boot option 'noht'. HT enabled with 'noht' ?? 'noht' means "no HT", "no hyperthreading", disabled. | When testing under 2.5.32, the kernel was | built as an SMP kernel, and was run on the hardware with HT enabled | through selecting ACPI in configuration. -- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/