Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756724Ab3CQXji (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Mar 2013 19:39:38 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:47212 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755851Ab3CQXjh (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Mar 2013 19:39:37 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,861,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="272089081" Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:39:07 +0100 From: Samuel Ortiz To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-kernel Subject: Re: New MFD tree for linux-next Message-ID: <20130317233907.GB4809@zurbaran> References: <20130314000201.GA4425@zurbaran> <20130315164625.GA29531@zurbaran> <20130316132753.591db4c078d06db297ba46a8@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130316132753.591db4c078d06db297ba46a8@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1769 Lines: 54 Hi Stephen, On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 01:27:53PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Samuel, > > On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:46:25 +0100 Samuel Ortiz wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 01:02:01AM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > > > > > > I am moving the MFD development from mfd-2.6.git/for-next to a new mfd-next > > > tree: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sameo/mfd-next.git > > > > > > Could you please point linux-next at it ? Many thanks in advance. > > Done. Thanks. > I assume that you are still using the for-next branch? I will update for-next branch to be in sync with mfd-next until the 3.10 merge window closes. After that I'll probably delete the mfd-2.6.git tree. > > I'm also carrying MFD fixes through the mfd-fixes tree: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sameo/mfd-fixes.git > > > > Could you please also add it to linux-next ? > > What branch should I use of that? Ah, I didn't see that the remote tree still carries the mfd-2.6 branches, I'll remove them. Please use master. > BTW, those two trees look very similar (in fact "diff -u <(git ls-remote > mfd) <(git ls-remote mfd-fixes)" only shows a couple of differences in > all the refs). You do realise that I can use 2 different branches of one > tree, right (as can others)? I understand that :) But using 2 trees rather than 2 separate branches is more convenient to my personal workflow. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/