Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752120Ab3CRKh3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2013 06:37:29 -0400 Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net ([64.71.152.64]:56846 "EHLO dcvr.yhbt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751323Ab3CRKh1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2013 06:37:27 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:37:26 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Lai Jiangshan , "Paul E. McKenney" , Stephen Hemminger , Davide Libenzi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Linux kernel Wait-Free Concurrent Queue Implementation Message-ID: <20130318103726.GA8630@dcvr.yhbt.net> References: <20130311213602.GB9829@Krystal> <20130314042227.GA15675@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20130314131855.GA9155@Krystal> <20130314190746.GA16120@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20130316220216.GA25099@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20130317020353.GA9344@Krystal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130317020353.GA9344@Krystal> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 678 Lines: 14 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Thanks for providing this detailed scenario. I think there is an > important aspect in the use of splice I suggested on which we are not > fully understanding each other. I will annotate your scenario below with > clarifications: Ah yes, I somehow thought splice would overwrite its destination. I've confirmed everything works as expected and have an updated RFC coming. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/