From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>
Organization: Linaro Limited 
To: "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Subject: Re: request line field in the generic slave config structure
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:30:00 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-8-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; )
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
References: <1363612546.18714.85.camel@smile>
In-Reply-To: <1363612546.18714.85.camel@smile>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201303181330.00610.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 953
Lines: 26

On Monday 18 March 2013, Shevchenko, Andriy wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> It seems the one (as I think good) question was left unanswered:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg186120.html
> 
> What is your opinions, comments?

I'm not sure I understand what the question was. Is this about
whether we should remove the "slave_id" field in the slave
configuration?

Those sort of duplicate the request line information that comes
from the platform in a data structure that should be filled by
the device driver without platform specific knowledge.

I believe that is currently used by shmobile, and we won't be able
to kill that before that platform has been converted to use
dma_request_slave_channel.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/