Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 03:24:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 03:24:57 -0400 Received: from denise.shiny.it ([194.20.232.1]:10191 "EHLO denise.shiny.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 03:24:56 -0400 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.7 on Linux X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3D88208E.8545AAA2@kegel.com> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 09:29:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Giuliano Pochini To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: Hardware limits on numbers of threads? Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 665 Lines: 20 On 18-Sep-2002 Dan Kegel wrote: > http://people.redhat.com/drepper/glibcthreads.html says: > >> Hardware restrictions put hard limits on the number of >> threads the kernel can support for each process. [...] > Is this true? Where does the limit come from? Threads are a software thing. If you can have 2 threads, so there is no limit, unless you want to make use of some hardware facility I'm not aware of. Bye. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/