Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 10:58:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 10:58:14 -0400 Received: from hq.fsmlabs.com ([209.155.42.197]:47063 "EHLO hq.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 10:58:13 -0400 From: Cort Dougan Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 09:01:05 -0600 To: William Lee Irwin III , Andries Brouwer , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK Message-ID: <20020918090104.E14918@host110.fsmlabs.com> References: <20020918123206.GA14595@win.tue.nl> <20020918144939.GU3530@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020918144939.GU3530@holomorphy.com>; from wli@holomorphy.com on Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 07:49:39AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 549 Lines: 11 Can we get a lockless, scalable, fault-tolerant, pre-emption safe, zero-copy and distributed get_pid() that meets the Carrier Grade specification? If at all possible I need it to do garbage collection, too. Perhaps a get_pid() that solves the Turning Halting Problem should be on the todo list for 2.6. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/