Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 11:29:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 11:29:23 -0400 Received: from hq.fsmlabs.com ([209.155.42.197]:61399 "EHLO hq.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 11:29:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 09:31:11 -0600 From: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Cort Dougan , William Lee Irwin III , Andries Brouwer , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK Message-ID: <20020918093111.A9315@hq.fsmlabs.com> References: <20020918090104.E14918@host110.fsmlabs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from mingo@elte.hu on Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 05:33:54PM +0200 Organization: FSM Labs Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 805 Lines: 20 On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 05:33:54PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Cort Dougan wrote: > > > Can we get a lockless, scalable, fault-tolerant, pre-emption safe, > > zero-copy and distributed get_pid() that meets the Carrier Grade > > specification? [...] > > of course, and it should also be massively-threaded, LSB-compliant, > enterprise-ready, secure, cluster-aware, power-saving and self-healing. I > admit that there's still lots of work to be done, but there's just so many > hours in a day. The ecosystem thanks you for your efforts. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/