Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932603Ab3CSO77 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:59:59 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:4132 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932171Ab3CSO76 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:59:58 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=H5hZMpki c=1 sm=0 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:17 a=mNMOxpOpBa8A:10 a=Jlu5nvpyoosA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=dwZyKuPOOjEA:10 a=-p4YWH2EONuYmNkEYYIA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 74.67.115.198 Message-ID: <1363705197.5938.31.camel@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] perf util: Get rid of write_or_die() from trace-event-info.c From: Steven Rostedt To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Namhyung Kim , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , LKML , Frederic Weisbecker Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:59:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1363704594.22553.56.camel@laptop> References: <1363683224-28804-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <1363683224-28804-4-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <1363703711.5938.20.camel@gandalf.local.home> <1363704594.22553.56.camel@laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 938 Lines: 31 On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 15:49 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 10:35 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > What about: > > int err = 0; > > > > err += tracing_data_header(); > > err += read_header_files(); > > [...] > > > > if (err < 0) { > > free(tdata); > > tdata = NULL; > > } > > > > Also, is the only clean up needed be freeing tdata? > > I always use err |= foo() and if (err) but I suppose it doesn't matter > the original error codes are lost both ways which doesn't seem to be a > problem here. err |= foo() is fine too. Both are better that err1, err2, err3, ..., errN :-) -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/