Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757593Ab3CTByi (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Mar 2013 21:54:38 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:19838 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754805Ab3CTByh (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Mar 2013 21:54:37 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=H5hZMpki c=1 sm=0 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:17 a=mNMOxpOpBa8A:10 a=s5RgfaFXP7gA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=vcfcUXAzZI4A:10 a=BUhKDa4HkDfaUFyo9FEA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 74.67.115.198 Message-ID: <1363744474.6345.0.camel@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] perf util: Handle failure case in trace_report() From: Steven Rostedt To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , LKML , Frederic Weisbecker Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 21:54:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ip4mj2ly.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> References: <1363683224-28804-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <1363683224-28804-6-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <1363704473.5938.25.camel@gandalf.local.home> <87ip4mj2ly.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1754 Lines: 48 On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 10:12 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/trace-event-read.c > >> @@ -293,7 +293,10 @@ ssize_t trace_report(int fd, struct pevent **ppevent, bool __repipe) > >> int show_version = 0; > >> int show_funcs = 0; > >> int show_printk = 0; > >> - ssize_t size; > >> + ssize_t size = -1; > >> + struct pevent *pevent; > >> + > >> + *ppevent = NULL; > >> > >> calc_data_size = 1; > >> repipe = __repipe; > >> @@ -317,34 +320,38 @@ ssize_t trace_report(int fd, struct pevent **ppevent, bool __repipe) > >> file_bigendian = buf[0]; > >> host_bigendian = bigendian(); > >> > >> - *ppevent = read_trace_init(file_bigendian, host_bigendian); > >> - if (*ppevent == NULL) > >> - die("read_trace_init failed"); > >> + pevent = read_trace_init(file_bigendian, host_bigendian); > >> + if (pevent == NULL) { > > > > Shouldn't we still set *ppevent to NULL? Or will the user now need to > > make sure that its pevent is NULL and always check for error? > > I thought it's impossible to check return value for error since we don't > know how large a tracing data is, so I decided to init *ppevent to NULL > at the beginning and set it to a valid pevent right before return. Thus > user need to check NULL before using it. > > In the above case of perf_event__process_tracing_data(), it's a pipe > mode and we can know its size since it's saved in a temp file. > My fault, I missed the addition of *ppevent = NULL at the beginning. Ignore this comment. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/