Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:38:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:38:47 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:35848 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:38:43 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 14:43:06 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@duckman.distro.conectiva To: Cort Dougan Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Andries Brouwer , William Lee Irwin III , Subject: Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK In-Reply-To: <20020918113551.A654@host110.fsmlabs.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 834 Lines: 26 On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Cort Dougan wrote: > It's also not a bad idea to sometimes say "Linux cannot do that". > Trying to make the system do _everything_ will result in it doing many > things very poorly. That's been tried before, but for some reason people just won't listen and Linux ended up running on non-x86 machines and even SMP. I don't see any reason to rule out a fix for this problem in principle, maybe somebody will come up with code that Linus does like ? cheers, Rik -- Spamtrap of the month: september@surriel.com http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/