Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 14:39:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 14:39:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:46242 "HELO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 14:39:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 20:51:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , Cort Dougan , Rik van Riel , Andries Brouwer , William Lee Irwin III , Subject: Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 727 Lines: 19 On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: > If you really really want to do this, then at least get it integrated > better (ie it should _replace_ pidhash since it appears to just > duplicate the functionality), and get the locking right. Maybe that will > make it look better. yes, i'm in the process of doing this. I havent cleaned up idtag.c (and its impact) yet, i started with pid.c. Once cleaned up it should have the same hashing overhead as the existing pidhash. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/