Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933124Ab3CTTNh (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:13:37 -0400 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:41992 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757684Ab3CTTNe (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:13:34 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:12:50 +0000 From: Matthew Garrett To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Oliver Neukum , Michal Marek , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pciehp: Add pciehp_surprise module option Message-ID: <20130320191250.GA11262@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20130320175234.GA8948@srcf.ucam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 707 Lines: 21 On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:11:15PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:52:34 +0000, > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Well that just sounds like a bug. What's the downside to just ignoring > > that capability bit? > > I'm afraid that it's too radical to enable always. Why? > Or, what about to check this bit only for disable path? What happens if you unplug the device on one of the affected machines? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/