Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755295Ab3CUAJO (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:09:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:17724 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753956Ab3CUAJK (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:09:10 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:08:45 -0400 From: Josh Boyer To: Boris Ostrovsky Cc: mingo@redhat.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, kraman@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, samu.kallio@aberdeencloud.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/x86: Patch out arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() when running on bare metal Message-ID: <20130321000845.GC15821@hansolo.jdub.homelinux.org> References: <5afe14ac-bc17-4fd1-9680-8f2566322437@default> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5afe14ac-bc17-4fd1-9680-8f2566322437@default> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1907 Lines: 49 On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 06:53:55AM -0700, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > ----- jwboyer@redhat.com wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:25:44AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > > On 03/01/2013 07:14 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > >On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 04:52:20PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > >>On 02/28/2013 04:42 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > >>>On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 01:36:29AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > >>>>On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 04:15:45PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > >>>>>>I'll try to get someone to test this tomorrow. > > > >>>>Btw, you'd need to apply that other patch too > > > >>>> > > > >>>>http://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=136206183814547&w=2 > > > >>>> > > > >>>>so that arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() has at least one caller on > > x86_64. > > > >>>Yeah, we already have that applied. It stops crashes in xen > > > >>>environments so we pulled it in as a bugfix. Thanks though! > > > >>> > > > >>Who are "we"? > > > >Sorry, Fedora. That patch has a link to a bug in it. We applied > > the > > > >patch for that bug. I'll apply Boris' patch on top and get the > > same > > > >people to test it. > > > > > > Josh, have you had a chance to test this? > > > > I've tested it on bare metal for a while now. No problems noticed at > > all. I've not heard back from Krishna who was testing it in the Xen > > environment. Krishna? > > > Any updates? No. I've still not heard from Krishna. At this point I've tested it on bare metal quite a bit, and Konrad has tested it on both bare metal and Xen. That should already cover the case Krishna was going to test anyway. I suggest we move forward and take the patch. josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/