Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753513Ab3CUEUN (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:20:13 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:55535 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751384Ab3CUEUM (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:20:12 -0400 Message-ID: <1363839594.17680.19.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] of: remove /proc/device-tree From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Grant Likely Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , devicetree-discuss , Rob Herring , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "David S. Miller" Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 05:19:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1363791074-16415-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> <1363791074-16415-3-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> <1363791479.12701.9.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.2-0ubuntu0.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 729 Lines: 20 On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 21:38 +0000, Grant Likely wrote: > > NAK. It should at the very least be a CONFIG option for a while > before > > completely switching over. > > I'll modify patch 1 to create the symlink if CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE is > not set. After the first patch can be applied we can leave it for a > release or two before applying the second. Shouldn't we have the symlink just be a config option itself ? Eventually distros might want get rid of it completely .. Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/